1. minister krishna tirth's proposal is absured and ridiculous as she is thinking to destroy the well running indian families.
2. after barberian 498a again there is an unplanned and currupt law of giving salry to a women who is married.
3. not thinking about the women who is dependent on his son and is widowed mother. who born and brought up the child of theirs
4. this new law is not thinking about the sisters who are not married or widowed.
5. this barberic law will destroy the love between the family as it make them money oriented.
6. what about the men who is equally helping house wife in bringing up their children.
7. now a day insted of talking about independency of women the minister is talking about increasing dependency of women on a men.
8. i am a victimised women with my widowed sister and widowed mother who are totally dependet on our brothers earning will be treted negligible by these so called kanun ke rakhvale.- what about us.
9. every new law is a new way of earning money by these lawyers , judges and ministers and increasing curruption in judiciary.
10 . making law without thinking about the whole society is very ridiculus way of thinking.
2. after barberian 498a again there is an unplanned and currupt law of giving salry to a women who is married.
3. not thinking about the women who is dependent on his son and is widowed mother. who born and brought up the child of theirs
4. this new law is not thinking about the sisters who are not married or widowed.
5. this barberic law will destroy the love between the family as it make them money oriented.
6. what about the men who is equally helping house wife in bringing up their children.
7. now a day insted of talking about independency of women the minister is talking about increasing dependency of women on a men.
8. i am a victimised women with my widowed sister and widowed mother who are totally dependet on our brothers earning will be treted negligible by these so called kanun ke rakhvale.- what about us.
9. every new law is a new way of earning money by these lawyers , judges and ministers and increasing curruption in judiciary.
10 . making law without thinking about the whole society is very ridiculus way of thinking.
Request all to wake up and meet your MP/MLA/Minister and demand :
ReplyDelete1. The word "relative" should be removed immediately as right and responsibility of resolve any marriage disputes lies to husbands and wife.
2. The IPC 498A should be made gender neutral, as more than 62000 married men also ending their life due to harassment by their wife( refer the crime Bure report) and wife family due to continuous mental harassment, demand of money/property from husbands family. The word Husband/wife to be replaced by the word "Spouse".
3. The marriage related LAW should be made bailable offense, like all over world have and to be resolved in civil law only. If there is any crime done the same is already covered in IPC by Domestic violence law, attempt to murder law, hurt to injury law, extortion and blackmailing law along with dowry provision act DP3/4.
4. Such law not only duplication of law , but abuse of natural Justice system of India.Where the wife and their family can get whole sale free license to abuse the husbands family and do the extortion of money/property in the name of marriage. Why the same should not be termed as crime?
5. By default punishment to misuser should be must when court find the FIR had been registered to hide their own crime or to gain any favor like money/property from other party.
PPT to stop the legal terrorism
Join SIF Team to Stop this legal terrorism of India and demand to replace the word Husband/wife to Spouse to all marriage related LAW or policy like all over world follow instead of making assumption that all wives born in Raja Harish Chandra family ( never lie) and all husbands born in Criminal family.
I have the following to suggest:-
ReplyDelete1) IPC 498A needs to be scrapped altogether. Anti Dowry Laws are grossly misused.
2) Domestic Violence Act is even worse than 498A. It is a method of Legal Extorsion. It is anti-male and only meant for females. It is absolutely gender biased and is draconian in nature. This needs to be reviewed and gender biased provisions need to be removed.